Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 0.66, Δ 1.09).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 494Lead | Accurate passes | 434 |
| 559Lead | Total passes | 489 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |