Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 1.42, Δ 0.98).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 419 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 487 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.09 | Goals prevented | 0.09 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |