Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.09 vs 0.27, Δ 1.82).
- Inter fired more attempts (12 vs 4 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.27 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 534Lead | Accurate passes | 372 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |