Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 1.07, Δ 1.34).
- Inter fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 418Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.58 | Goals prevented | 0.58 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |