Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 1.30, Δ 0.60).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Inter held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |