Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 0.51, Δ 2.12).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (26 vs 11 shots).
- Ipswich held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |