Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 2.00, Δ 0.42).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 144 | Accurate passes | 655Lead |
| 227 | Total passes | 729Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.