Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 0.89, Δ 0.05).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 431 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 495 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |