Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (0.42 vs 1.52, Δ 1.10).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 36%).
- Ipswich held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 438Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1 | Goals prevented | -1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |