Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 0.39, Δ 0.07).
- QPR fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 358 |
| 526Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |