Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 0.51, Δ 1.24).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 376Lead | Total passes | 322 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |