Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 1.64, Δ 0.13).
- Rotherham fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.64 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 282Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 398Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |