Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (2.31 vs 0.73, Δ 1.58).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 2.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 384 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 472 | Total passes | 504Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |