Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.71, Δ 0.56).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.71Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 292 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.28 | Goals prevented | -0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ipswich | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.