Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (79% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 21% | Ball possession | 79%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 96 | Accurate passes | 534Lead |
| 159 | Total passes | 595Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.