Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 44%).
- Ismaily SC held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 355Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 463Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.