Match statistics snapshot
- Ismaily SC fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Haras El Hodood was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 27%).
- Ismaily SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 178 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.