Match statistics snapshot
- Ismaily SC fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Ismaily SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 460Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.