Match statistics snapshot
- Ismaily SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 0.59, Δ 0.12).
- Ismaily SC fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 238Lead |
| 272 | Total passes | 304Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.26 | Goals prevented | 0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ismaily Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.