Match statistics snapshot
- İstanbulspor fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| İstanbulspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| İstanbulspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 379 |
| 453 | Total passes | 453 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| İstanbulspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| İstanbulspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| İstanbulspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.