Match statistics snapshot
- Ituano created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 0.57, Δ 0.24).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Ituano was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ituano | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.57 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ituano | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 365Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 432Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ituano | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ituano | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ituano | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.