Match statistics snapshot
- Ituano created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.96, Δ 0.21).
- Ituano fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Guarani Campinas was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ituano | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ituano | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 404Lead | Accurate passes | 363 |
| 491Lead | Total passes | 457 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ituano | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ituano | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ituano | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |