Match statistics snapshot
- Jagiellonia created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 1.12, Δ 0.29).
- Jagiellonia fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Jagiellonia was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Jagiellonia | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Jagiellonia | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 494Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 580Lead | Total passes | 361 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Jagiellonia | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Jagiellonia | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Jagiellonia | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |