JäPS 1-1 EIF Prediction

JäPSJäPS
1 — 1FT
EIFEIF

Updated

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — too close to call

Estimated win chances: Jäps 36.8%, draw 23.1%, Eif 40.1%. From 10 and 10 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityMedium
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceLow

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.60Expected goals1.68

From 10 and 10 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–110.7%
  • 1–29%
  • 2–18.5%
  • 2–27.2%
  • 0–16.7%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

35Cold spellJäps
Weighted momentum

Eif arrives with stronger form weighting (+21 momentum).

56BuildingEif
Jäps · High-risk / fragile

Jäps

2W · 4D · 4L
Recent →WDLDLDDLLW
Momentum index

Eif

6W · 1D · 3L
Recent →WLLDWWLWWW
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapEif +9

Jäps

10 pts
20% wins

2W · 4D · 4L · 10 played

For
16
Against
23
Goal diff -7

Eif

19 pts
60% wins

6W · 1D · 3L · 10 played

For
19
Against
14
Goal diff +5

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Jäps offensive edge

    Jäps faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -3
  • Eif offensive edge

    Eif's attack (45%) vs Jäps's defense (42%).

    +3

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Jäps55
Eif45

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Jäps42
Eif58

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Jäps35
Eif56

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Jäps44
Eif56

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Jäps48
Eif30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Jäps42
Eif58

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Jäps62
Eif38
JäpsHigh-risk / fragile

H2H in this snapshot

From 7 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.

3Jäps43%
2Draws
2Eif29%

Recent meetings