Match statistics snapshot
- JEF United Chiba created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 0.77, Δ 0.62).
- Mito Hollyhock fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- JEF United Chiba was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Jef United Chiba | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Jef United Chiba | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Jef United Chiba | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Jef United Chiba | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Jef United Chiba | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.