Match statistics snapshot
- De Graafschap fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Jong AZ was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- De Graafschap held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Jong Az | Statistic | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 7 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Jong Az | Statistic | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Jong Az | Statistic | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Jong Az | Statistic | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Jong Az | Statistic | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |