Match statistics snapshot
- ADO Den Haag fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Jong Utrecht was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 54%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Ado Den Haag |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Ado Den Haag |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 291Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Ado Den Haag |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Ado Den Haag |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Ado Den Haag |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.