Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Jong Utrecht was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
- Almere City FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Jong Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.