Match statistics snapshot
- Junior created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 0.52, Δ 0.56).
- Junior fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Junior | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Junior | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 355Lead | Accurate passes | 160 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Junior | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Junior | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.05 | Goals prevented | 0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Junior | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.