Match statistics snapshot
- Junior created the clearer chances on xG (2.87 vs 1.40, Δ 1.47).
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- LDU de Quito was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Junior | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 2.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Junior | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 296Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 370Lead | Total passes | 256 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Junior | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Junior | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Junior | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.