Match statistics snapshot
- Juventus created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.17, Δ 1.03).
- Juventus fired more attempts (13 vs 3 shots).
- Juventus was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.17 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 484Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.71 | Goals prevented | -0.71 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |