Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 1.38, Δ 0.55).
- Juventus was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 392 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 456 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.36 | Goals prevented | 0.36 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Juventus | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |