Match statistics snapshot
- Juventus created the clearer chances on xG (3.40 vs 0.90, Δ 2.50).
- Juventus fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Juventus was more accurate in front of goal (61% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Juventus | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3.40Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Juventus | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 341 |
| 584Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Juventus | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Juventus | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.75 | Goals prevented | -0.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Juventus | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |