Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 0.86, Δ 0.42).
- Inter fired more attempts (8 vs 4 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Juventus | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Juventus | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 680Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 751Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Juventus | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Juventus | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Juventus | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |