Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (0.50 vs 1.57, Δ 1.07).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kalmar Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 0.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kalmar Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 374 | Accurate passes | 502Lead |
| 471 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kalmar Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kalmar Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kalmar Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |