Match statistics snapshot
- Kansas City W fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
- Kansas City W held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 304Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 400Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |