Match statistics snapshot
- Kansas City W fired more attempts (23 vs 15 shots).
- Kansas City W was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 27%).
- Bay FC held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |