Match statistics snapshot
- Kansas City W fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Kansas City W was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 14%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 521Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 621Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kansas City W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |