Match statistics snapshot
- Nea Salamis created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 2.98, Δ 1.76).
- Nea Salamis fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Nea Salamis was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Karmiotissa | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.98Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Karmiotissa | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 379 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 440 | Total passes | 487Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Karmiotissa | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Karmiotissa | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Karmiotissa | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Statistics is not available yet.