Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 0.74, Δ 0.17).
- Kashima fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 182 | Accurate passes | 220Lead |
| 260 | Total passes | 309Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.