Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 203 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 463Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.