Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 0.54, Δ 0.20).
- Kashima fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 338Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.