Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.98, Δ 0.16).
- Kashima fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 338Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.