Match statistics snapshot
- Kashiwa Reysol created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 1.20, Δ 0.27).
- Kyoto Sanga fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 189Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 298Lead | Total passes | 266 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |