Match statistics snapshot
- Kashiwa Reysol created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 0.47, Δ 1.61).
- Kashiwa Reysol fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Kashiwa Reysol was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 409 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 493 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.