Match statistics snapshot
- Mito Hollyhock fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Kashiwa Reysol was more accurate in front of goal (78% on target vs 19%).
- Kashiwa Reysol held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 510Lead | Accurate passes | 410 |
| 582Lead | Total passes | 488 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kashiwa Reysol | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.