Match statistics snapshot
- Katwijk fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 12%).
- Katwijk held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Katwijk | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Katwijk | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 121 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 232 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Katwijk | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Katwijk | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Katwijk | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |