Match statistics snapshot
- Avispa Fukuoka created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 1.44, Δ 0.01).
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Kawasaki Frontale was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 580Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |