Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 1.81, Δ 1.02).
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Kawasaki Frontale held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |