Match statistics snapshot
- Kawasaki Frontale created the clearer chances on xG (2.06 vs 2.02, Δ 0.04).
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Mito Hollyhock was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 2.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 545Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 634Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.